For the safety of our clients, we are available for virtual meetings via Zoom.

Pratt & Associates

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • HOA Law
    • ADR, Mediation, Arbitration
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Easement, Encroachment, & Boundary Disputes
    • Real Estate Transactions
    • Construction Law
  • Our Attorneys
    • Sharon Glenn Pratt
    • Rosalia Burgueño Tapia
    • Patricia A. Wendleton
    • Pierce Gore
    • Grant Turner
  • About Us
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
408.369.0800
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • ELECTION BY ACCLAMATION: IS IT PERMITTED?
 

ELECTION BY ACCLAMATION: IS IT PERMITTED?

ELECTION BY ACCLAMATION: IS IT PERMITTED?

by Pat Geddie / Thursday, 01 November 2018 / Published in Latest News
Election Acclamation

By: Rosalia Burgueño Tapia

Occasionally, a homeowner association (HOA) is faced with the situation of having an uncontested election.  In such a case, must the HOA still go through the formalities of an election?  Some say yes, and some say no.  Current law seems to require a vote, even if uncontested.  SB 1128 would have given HOAs the express authority to declare an election by acclamation, but it was vetoed on 9/30/18.

Current law:  California Civil Code §5100 of the Davis-Stirling Act

  • Regardless of any other law or provision of the governing documents, elections regarding the election and removal of directors shall be held by secret ballot.
  • Directors shall not be required to be elected if the governing documents provide that one member from each separate interest is a director.
  • If there is a conflict between California Civil Code §§5100-5145 and the California Corporations Code relating to elections, Davis-Stirling prevails.

SB 1128:  Election by Acclamation

SB 1128 would have exempted HOAs in a common-interest development from current election procedure requirements in uncontested elections, if certain requirements met:

  • At the close of the nomination period, the number of director nominees is not more than the     number of vacancies on the board, as determined by the inspector of elections.
  • Election rules, required by Section 5105, have been adopted and complied with.
  • HOA provides individual notice of the election and procedure for nominating candidates at least 30 days prior to the close of the nomination period.  The notice shall state certain statutory language (procedures regarding two meetings to be held by the board).
  • After the close of the nomination period, a resolution is introduced at a Board meeting to fill the vacancies to be elected with names of the persons who have been nominated as of the close of the nomination period.  At this same meeting, the Board provides general notice of an additional nomination period of 21 days in which any additional candidate may submit his/her name to the inspector to fill the vacancies to be elected.
  • The Board adopts the resolution not less than 28 days after it is introduced.
  • If, after the additional nomination period, the total number of candidates exceed the number of vacancies, an election shall be held.  If not, then the Board shall amend the resolution to include the additional candidates. 
  • Once the resolution is adopted, the new Board shall be deemed elected immediately following the adoption of the resolution.

Potential Problems with Declaring Election by Acclamation Absent Statutory Authority

  • Governing documents either do not expressly allow it, or contain provisions that do not make it possible, i.e., elections are to occur at annual meeting, nominations from the floor allowed, etc.
  • What can happen if an HOA declares an election by acclamation?
  • Pros?  Cons?
  • Is it worth the risk?
  • Are you for or against elections by acclamation?

Other Interesting Parts of SB 1128:

  • Contained provision mandating disqualifying nominees who, within the past 20 years, had been convicted of a felony involving accepting, giving, or offering to give, a bribe, embezzlement, extortion or theft of money, perjury or conspiracy to commit any of these crimes.
  • Allowed for the HOA to disqualify nominees (through its bylaws), including incumbents, who are not current in payment of regular assessments; and prohibit more than 1 person with joint ownership interest in the same lot from serving on the board, and disqualify a nominee who has been a member less than one year.

About the Author:

Rosalia Burgueño Tapia is an attorney with Pratt & Associates in Los Gatos, California.  She is a specialist in common interest development law and litigation and has been practicing in Santa Clara County for 24 years.  She can be reached at 408-369-0800.

  • HOA Law
  • ADR, Mediation, Arbitration
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Easement, Encroachment, & Boundary Disputes
  • Real Estate Transactions
  • Construction Law
Get a case evaluation.
Call now 408.369.0800
Sharon G. Pratt
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...

Best Real Estate Lawyers in San Jose
CONTACT US

Call us at 408.369.0800 or fill out the form to schedule your consultation.

CONTACT US

408.369.0800 - Phone
408.369.0752 - Fax

CONTACT US

408.369.0800 - Phone
408.369.0752 - Fax

OFFICE LOCATION

634 North Santa Cruz Avenue Suite 204
Los Gatos, CA 95030

OFFICE LOCATION

634 North Santa Cruz Avenue Suite 204
Los Gatos, CA 95030

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Our Attorneys
  • About Us
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
Copyright © 2021 Website design by FirmFinder
TOP